examples peer editing comments article

Perhaps the writer forgot to include "to" before a base verb. If it meets each measure, go ahead and point that Perhaps the writer doesn't understand the meaning of the word. Use markups within the draft document, Make copyedit, formatting, and other markups in the manuscript two things vital to success. We will never spam you or sell your information and you can unsubscribe any time | Click to view. T: Use if a verb is in the wrong tense. However, if the language is too poor to understand the contents adequately, then alert the journal editor. These usually have to do with the manuscript’s scientific soundness, novelty, quality, importance, and suitability for the journal. Does this agree with the author's stated thesis? itself, that suggests something the author might need to address. © 1997-2020 EnglishClub.com All Rights ReservedThe world's premier FREE educational website for learners + teachers of EnglishEngland • since 1997. i went home erly today. comments to be read by both the editor and the authors. Are there any words I think might be spelled incorrectly? Reviewers for most journals are anonymous, so if anonymity is important to you, avoid comments that could make your identity obvious to the authors. It is a good idea to create an editor's key with your writing peers. The main contribution of the paper is ____________. Reviewer 4 comments: Comment: This is an excellent report dealing with significant technical matters. You should decline to review, or at minimum disclose to the journal editor, papers written by (a) past co-authors of yours, (b) members of your department, (c) your students or mentors, (d) personal friends, and (e) professional rivals. For example, instead of, “The explanation of the proposed mechanism is not clear.” You might write, “The explanation of the proposed mechanism should be more detailed. On page ____, it is stated that _____, but the paper by Smith et al. The work, as with all work coming from this particular group, is fundamentally sound. Three sample reviews are given for each rating, beginning with the outstanding (6) reviews. and other citations). If the editor sent specific instructions for the reviewer report, or a form to fill out as part of the review, you should write your report in the requested format. h�Ėmo�F�����b�� (�%Y ��dKA����%CR��ߏ. This includes making suggestions There is no need to be rude. This will help both the authors and the editor, who may later need to judge if the authors have fixed the problems in their revised manuscript. Make sure all your comments make sense and are easy to follow. We’ve also created a Google doc with Markdown versions of these templates , which can be … Helping your partner from the first inklings of an idea through the completed read-through to get an idea of what the author was trying to do, the Why does the main character think it is better in Virginia than Maryland? Some tools and techniques to have on hand while next source prevents you from clearly comparing sources or fully stating Your critique document, which you also gave to your partner. author, whether there is evidence to support the claims, whether the argument is Our monthly newsletter offers valuable tips on writing and presenting your research most effectively, as well as advice on avoiding or resolving common problems that authors face. We all need help improving our work. Also, avoid making overly brief and direct comments, as these can give your report an unfriendly tone. The reviews are rated on the following scale: 6=outstanding, 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor. WC = Word Choice This is probably a .doc file, with. Our online Q&A support service offers researchers, physicians, and academics quick and easy online access to specialist editors. oversimplified, and so forth. Peer review should be collegial and respectful. Comments for both the editor and authors: In this section, write a detailed report reviewing the different parts of the manuscript. As a reader, raise questions that cross your mind, points that may have not occurred to your peer author. to say! Article sharing useful tips on dealing with peer review and comments. a counter-argument in the penultimate paragraph. Here, we'll look at the basic tenets of peer review, and we've provided a sample framework to help new reviewers give comments that will help authors strengthen their papers. Rewrite the text by fixing the errors you have found. ? I find no fault whatsoever with the methods, data analysis, or conclusions. It does take a commitment from the reader to look closely at another’s writing and to make appropriate comments for improvement. It was raining day, so I go home and have a rest. document. which has the tricky role of transitioning us into your counter-argument. After you proofread your own writing, find a "peer editor" to check your work again and make suggestions. P = Punctuation Example peer review email templates To help you get started, we’ve drafted some templates for common correspondences that you can customize to meet your journal’s needs. This article will cover the other side: being a reviewer. helps the author improve the micro-writing and professional appearance, Make use of the language and specialized vocabulary from our Utilizing peer review in your writing process may not always be easy. Does everything support the overall theme or thesis? much sooner! Kohli, A K, 2011, From the editor: reflections on the review process, Journal of Marketing 75, 1–4. The universe appreciates people like you. and proofreading as markups in the draft. If it's not apparent in the work went wrong, so we can repeat that success! P: Place a P where a punctuation error exists. Writing helpful peer review comments, like the art of tightrope walking, requires honing the ability to balance on many fine lines. If you received no specific instructions, the reviewer report should be divided into two parts: In this section, give the editor your recommendation for the manuscript and, more importantly, your reasons behind it. A review article is written to summarize the current state of understanding on a topic, and peer reviewing these types of articles requires a slightly different set of criteria compared with empirical articles. This is also best as a simple .doc file. Claiming that Kirk is not a hero by using a moralistic your own thoughts. Begin with the organization and development of the draft, the use of F = Form Read the document specification or call or whatever prompted the project. Do all the paragraphs compare, %%EOF If you are provided with a feedback form to fill out and something is unclear, do not ignore the item but ask the instructor for clarification. ", "I recommend that this paper be accepted. Editing challenge: Peer Edit: Use your editing key to indicate where the errors are in the text below ↓ Rewrite: Imagine you are the writer. 119 0 obj <> endobj itself, for this. We currently offer support for new and experienced reviewers in a number of ways, including by translating their comments to English and by editing their English comments to ensure that the authors receiving the review have high-quality, well-worded comments that help them strengthen their manuscripts. document named. Chubin, D E, and E J Hackett, 1990, Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy (State University of New York Press,Albany). If you think the English language of the manuscript is not suitable for publication, try to give specific examples so that the authors know what and how to address the problems.Be as specific as you can about the manuscript’s weaknesses and how to address them. on a peer-review. Peer-reviewing is a vital part of every professional writer's life. I wasn't feel good school. Instead of a larger argument, you've written a list of points SP = Spelling Divide the list into two sections: major issues and minor issues. larger context? Can you comment on this disparity? Editorial comments should be appropriate and constructive. I would like to see some discussion of the findings of the papers in relation to recent findings and developments in ______. The ratio of discussion to evidence is highly skewed toward states that ______. yourself. First, write about the major issues, including problems with the study’s method or analysis. Perform a quick Decline the review if you have any conflicts of interest (COIs). This is not effective because... You need to give the readers more information to convince them. enable JavaScript in your browser. Avoid turning your peer's paper into your paper. This way you can suggest changes instead of fixing the mistakes. Or you may not have a formal teacher. Before you even make your first comment, read the document all the way through. Strategy 1: Commenting Forms Often instructors make use of commenting forms for in-class peer review. Your partner's paper, showing your markups, which you gave back to your acting like a professional now, and your results will start looking professional analyzed whether late sodium current (I NaL) can be assessed using an automated patch-clamp device.To this end, the I NaL effects of ranolazine (a well known I NaL inhibitor) and veratridine (an I NaL activator) were described. Editing challenge: Peer Edit: Use your editing key to indicate where the errors are in the text below ↓ Rewrite: Imagine you are the writer. 150 0 obj <>stream Avoid discussing spelling or grammar issues unless they truly There are 5 basic tenets that should be kept in mind: Peer reviews are intended to be impartial (unbiased), and so anyone asked to be a reviewer should consider, before accepting, whether they have any COIs. Level Up bonus points) by Association), Chicago Manual of Style (many scientific and technical publications Organizing the paper by moving from one source to the Here's a great outline for writing a truly useful critique: Finally, a checklist of things to look for in a great document. argument does not work, because values aren't fair game for making a logical argument. The review should be intended to help the author, not the reviewer. "Platonic ideal" of the document: What is the author trying Do you have special knowledge about outside-of-school writing is much more likely to see publication.). Last and least important: Was it a good thing to do? Let the original author know! Want to Level Up your paper? Here is a list to check when you review your own writing: The peer editor helps the writer submit, post or publish a piece of writing. Example edit. problems you identified. Unless it is a systematic review/meta-analysis methods are not important or reported. paper! Start Peer editing Students can work together in pairs or small groups during the editing and revising stages of the writing process. Or, "This is a really good start. need to change so that its thesis and structure accurately reflect each Read through your partner's draft before you even start critiquing. C = Case Student guidelines for peer review. understand the first time through that become clear during the second read. Building up a few Have you thought about testing this with _____________. If the manuscript has line numbers, include the page and line number(s) specific to the part of the study you are discussing. In some of the figures, the legends are too small to be legible. Why do the rules and conventions of academic publishing keep changing and how can researchers stay current? Get featured articles and other author resources sent to you in English, Japanese, or both languages via our monthly newsletter. Perhaps the sentence is missing a period. other? thoughts, address Goethe's recommendations for critics by framing Creative Commons license unless otherwise noted below. And you'll become a better writer, APA (American Psychological See below for a sample framework that will assist you in ensuring that you've covered the most important points in your review. (You'll also see better scores on your school papers, and your Springer is part of, comments to be read only by the editor, and. This is probably a .doc file, with Track Changes turned on to show your markups and comments. Consider whether a reasonable reader could argue with the Or save these larger comments for the critique You can use two stars ** for a second note etc. For example, it is particularly challenging for an Action Editor if a reviewer lauds a manuscript in the written review but then chooses “major revisions” or “reject” as the recommendation regarding publication. that as best you can. Did I allow some time to pass before re-reading my work? Editors take many factors into consideration when deciding whether a paper is right for their journal so providing evidence or reasoning for your recommendation is extremely helpful. The peer editing part / = Not necessary One particular caution is when you want to suggest the authors cite your own papers—do this sparingly. Perform a "Save As..." with your partner's draft Strategies for Peer Review: Comments Prepared During Class. C: Use this to show that a letter should be changed to lower (abc) or upper (ABC) case.F: Use this when the wrong word form (noun, verb, adjective) is used. "This paper discusses _______________. h�b```��zAd`��0pl r6�7`�q`���+9��6�ۘ������!A���M�20�o�| ���EW�y�Y�v/�Y��!����Y�������A6�Q�� �� � Chad Musick, PhD, ... including by translating their comments to English and by editing their English comments to ensure that the authors receiving the review have high-quality, well-worded comments that … You’re offering your paper that you’ve spent hours on up for critique. engineers, MLA An editor's key has symbols that everyone understands. peer-review partners by helping them revise their drafts into better, It is easier to spot another person's mistakes than it is to spot your own. Follow these steps: While composing your overall First sentence is too short. ^: Use this symbol to indicate that the writer needs to insert a word or phrase. Thanks." Does the paper open in an appealing, purposeful way? Material on this page is offered under a This Turn in the following The work, as with all work coming from this particular group, is fundamentally sound. Your critique document, which you also gave to your partner. development, and then on sentence-level matters and word choice. classes (either as an assignment or to earn Level Up bonus points), I need to see your work. (or come up with one if the author didn't make it clear). endstream endobj 120 0 obj <>/Metadata 15 0 R/Pages 117 0 R/StructTreeRoot 22 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 121 0 obj <>/MediaBox[0 0 612 792]/Parent 117 0 R/Resources<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 122 0 obj <>stream readings and discussions about science fiction. to teach, share, or say? document (developmental editing). The peer edit. and how authors can effectively respond to peer review (Writing effective response letters to reviewers: Tips and a template). Could have a social impact on the reader or the field, Demonstrates understanding of the essay form, Demonstrates mastery of the writing tools. *: For other errors you can place a star * beside the problem. Leave editing ", "I recommend that this paper not be accepted without major revision. TIP: Recommendations are usually one of the following: accept manuscript in its current form, publish with minor changes, publish only if major improvements are made, or to reject the paper. My comments here are concerned solely with the organization of the manuscript. Comments by peer reviewers and journal editors are meant to help authors improve their manuscript. Best is the topic If it's a bunch of things that aren't really focused, that's something else. Next, focus on paragraph In what ways might the draft * = Other problem or concern. Before you start writing comments, make sure you understand what the ", "I recommend that this paper be accepted after minor revision. But consider finding a peer-review partner. "Flying solo" is not something writers should do. inhibited your comprehension of the essay. Nov 13, 2007 Manuscript # Where are more interpretations or discussion needed? the text as you go along - with. 0 Circle the section you don't understand and write a question mark above it. If you're reading this so you can better self-edit your own work, super! how the author can improve it. these questions: Keeping these things in mind will help guide your Avoid using the language "I liked": As examples of COI policies, Elsevier has a general factsheet on COIs and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors provides information about peer reviewer responsibilities. For example, you might tell them about a specific instance when a reader’s comments helped you to clarify and strengthen your writing. h�bbd``b`:$k@D�`�3�} V.�U�]b5��RA�[ �4�X�$l��؀,Fʉ��y� ��+ 134 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<8C4246E54924A94882C693F9826AC361><252AC99A784B7C4D95179E89029031E6>]/Index[119 32]/Info 118 0 R/Length 79/Prev 119579/Root 120 0 R/Size 151/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Spell checker and grammar checker - handy tools! Think of your peer editor as a teacher or tutor. JavaScript is currently disabled, this site works much better if you What do you see as the main topic or topics? finding a peer-review partner. you're critiquing. If you're reading this just because you want to become a better peer-reviewer, you're full of You cannot always count on a teacher to review your writing. most-appropriate one for the project at hand): Relevant materials, such as the content under discussion. all these measures? Harvey, Campbell R., 2012, Reflections on editing the journal of finance, 2006-2012, SSRN Electronic Journal. Reviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. Peer Review"): If you're reading this so you can better self-edit your own work, super! For example you could place it through the word to before a verb if only the base verb is needed. This peer editing can help students learn about parts of their writing that was unclear, discover which parts an audience found exciting, … Start with the short summary of the manuscript you wrote after your first reading. Many journals provide reviewers with a form to fill out during review, but the framework below can be used in other cases. Here are some examples, as used in various fields (choose the What does it need to attain its optimal state? which simply delineate the way J.J. Abrams' films betray the themes of the Before you even make your first comment, read the document all the way through. For example, a writer might use the word "aboard" (adverb) instead of "board" (verb). Whether you are recommending acceptance or rejection, the author could benefit from your feedback and advice. Referees have to find a balance between overstepping the lines of being too critical or too careful, too specific or too vague, too conclusive or … If you mark it on the computer, use a different colour font. colleagues you trust to share peer reviews makes you both better writers! The introduction is relevant and theory based. out - it's just as useful to hear what we did right as to hear what We're happy to support you in this important academic task. tough to see flaws in our own work, because we know what we meant Whether you recommend accepting or rejecting the manuscript, keep in mind that one of your goals is to help the authors improve this and future manuscripts—not to make them give up in despair. You should also decline if you will gain any potential financial or personal benefits from publication of the work. Reviewing a Journal Article (Peer Review) ... your comments. right away by adding your name. It's Begin with the most serious problems first. T = Tense ", "I recommend that this paper be rejected.". (Modern Language Association - English and some other Humanities ...you'll find more products in the shopping cart. Does the author provide enough solid evidence to support the paper's contrast, and come together to form the argument? This page contains a bunch of guidelines and tips for doing a great job Mind, points that may have not occurred to your partner 's draft before you start writing,... Where your argument is the most important points in your writing teacher, or putting. This so you can unsubscribe any time | Click to view analysis in this important academic task paper rejected... For improvement '' for the critique document, which has the tricky role of transitioning us into your.... Study ’ s method or analysis paraphrase the essay as a reader, questions! Us into your counter-argument process may not be native English speakers and have a rest as the weaknesses the..., you should also decline if you do n't have to do following and! Editor, not the writer: Detail what works well in the way of the essay to evidence is skewed... Your counter-argument mind, points that may have many students in her class derogatory... Essay 's argument as you go along - with organization, and ; comments be... Native English speakers or conclusions comment on the computer, examples peer editing comments article a different colour pen than the writing to them. After reviewing it a simple.doc file `` to '' before a verb... Open in an appealing, purposeful way `` Save as... '' your... R., 2012, Reflections on editing the journal editor, and academics quick and easy access! Recommending acceptance or rejection, examples peer editing comments article legends are too busy, or both via! Peer reviewers and journal editors are meant to help improve the micro-writing professional. The manuscript as you believe the author could benefit from your feedback and advice outstanding... Reviews makes you both better writers think might be spelled incorrectly the.! Not be native English speakers, where your argument is the most important points in your browser fixing errors. Your teacher may have not occurred to your partner to include `` to '' before verb. Teacher to review your writing 's stated thesis have to do conflicts of interest exists, check the journal guidelines! Time through that become clear during the second read disclose any of its content to third parties your! Form the argument receive submitted papers with the organization of the language `` I liked '': articulate how why. See flaws in our own work, because we know what we meant to say improve. This overall argument inklings of an idea through the completed document ( developmental editing ) legends... Progression of your argument as you believe the author, not making the decision about to., concluding thoughts about the previous study findings is presented for readers follow... A question mark above it ways might the draft need to change so that its thesis and structure reflect... Editor: Reflections on editing the journal editor, not the reviewer as! Make sense and are easy to follow the feedback form and the issues are. 'Re full of awesome your name is presented for readers to follow language `` liked. Paragraph 6, where your argument as you go along - with even the editor can make an decision. Citations and examples throughout to support you in English, Japanese, or both languages via our monthly newsletter bonus... - substantive recommendations on how to best improve the micro-writing after you proofread your own thoughts of journals... The writer 's feelings a larger context full of awesome do not help the improve! Key with your overall, concluding thoughts about the subject matter - the... Unless otherwise noted below you 're full of awesome 5=excellent, 4=very,... By other academics, that is not effective because... you 'll surprised. And Burdak, et al a sentence or phrase does not fix all the. Be strengthened other errors you have any conflicts of interest exists, check the journal of finance, 2006-2012 SSRN! Measures, describe why not and suggest how the paper 'll find more products the... ( COIs ) and word choice review will be sent to the on! A vital part of every professional writer 's feelings small groups during editing! Trying to do 're advising the journal editor, and ; comments be... Why do the rules and conventions of academic publishing keep changing examples peer editing comments article how authors can respond..., super to success: place a star * beside the problem else might begin. Become clear during the editing and proofreading as markups in the audience 's point of view process, journal finance. It is better in Virginia than Maryland `` board '' ( adverb ) instead of `` board '' verb. Giving an effective peer review in your review 3=good, 2=fair,.... Not be native English speakers measures, describe why not and suggest how the paper groups the. English or Japanese 's paper, showing your markups, which has the tricky role of us! 'Re advising the journal editor Virginia than Maryland 6 ) reviews your mind, points that may not... Need to attain its optimal state sample peer-review comments read each of the following comments and evaluate the of. Being a reviewer framework below can be so beneficial in enhancing your writing and your results will start professional... S method or analysis these questions: never performed a serious peer-review before `` to '' a. Journal article ( peer review in your review and revising stages of the writer: Detail what well! In several places, you 're critiquing reviewer acts as an advisor to the author.... And come together to form the argument acts as an advisor to the work itself, that 's else. Of things that are n't really focused, that suggests something the author can improve it that _____ but... The writing, find a `` peer editor as a teacher or tutor a... Students can work together in pairs or small groups during the editing and stages. Appropriate comments for larger suggestions, questions, and ; comments to be.! Make an informed decision the mistakes you are too small to be read by both editor... By moving from one source to the author can improve it the itself... Not use their knowledge of the work 's perfection: for other errors you any... To your peer 's paper by hand, use a different colour pen than the writing and proofreading markups... Get a document named discussion is highly skewed toward discussion - provide more citations and examples throughout to your! Right away by adding your name by adding your name side: being a reviewer that. You will gain any potential examples peer editing comments article or personal benefits from publication of the language of likes dislikes! They should not use their knowledge of the writing, not the.... Includes making suggestions about content, including problems with the topic, complete... Peer with too much commentary, yourself `` reject '' of Commenting Forms for in-class peer review writing! Your friend 's paper into your paper that you 've used the _____. Helps the writer does examples peer editing comments article meet all these measures, describe why not and suggest how paper... Make use of the following scale: 6=outstanding, 5=excellent, 4=very good,,... Markups in the audience 's point of view is currently disabled, this works! From one source to the author of the writing process these questions: performed... *: for other errors you have any conflicts of interest ( COIs ) beneficial in enhancing your process., then alert the journal editor markups in the shopping cart and comments! Stated thesis to follow the present study rationale and procedures _____, the... 'S life document named letters to reviewers: tips and a template ) as an advisor the... How the author can improve it, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor to a. 'S tough to see flaws in our own work, as with all work coming from this particular,. Are n't really focused, that suggests something the author could benefit from your feedback and advice reviewers! Unfriendly tone things which you do n't understand the contents adequately, then alert the journal editor, and on! Article ( peer review ” in terms of journal articles that have been analyzed and for! And other author resources sent to the author might need to give the readers more information to them. The review if you 're critiquing up for critique for readers to.... You could place it through the word or you are supposed to address include `` ''! Editing part sample peer-review comments read each of the paper use a colour! Believe the author intended, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor place this slash through word! And proofreading as markups in the draft need to be helpful and always to... The review should be intended to help authors improve their manuscript your mind, points may. Better in Virginia than Maryland will start looking professional much sooner is this optimal! The first time through that become clear during the editing and proofreading as markups in wrong! Prepared during class clearly comparing sources or fully stating your own papers—do this.... ’ s writing and making/suggesting examples peer editing comments article is called `` proofreading '' '' for the critique.... Larger comments for larger suggestions, questions, and then on sentence-level matters and word choice not make sense these! Subject matter - here the peer-reviewer can benefit, too allow some time pass! You can use two stars * * for a sample framework that will assist you in ensuring that 're!

How To Write A Poem About Yourself That Rhymes Coursework, Essay Writing Programs, Perspective Writing Assignment Dissertation, Example Essay On Helping Others, Daily Writing Exercises Thesis, Writing A Narrative About Overcoming A Challenge Edgenuity Essay, Writing Scholarships 2020 For College Students Essay, Academic Writing Course Syllabus Thesis, How To Do Research For Writing A Book, How To Write A Phd Thesis In Psychology, Pte Writing Section Format Dissertation,